Emulation is a very difficult process, thankfully Windows 95 has very little requirements. On the phone it works perfectly like on a computer, if someone wants to have the operating system on the phone it's only Windows 95. You will need the limbo application to install windows on your phone.
For users there is a regression, things that used to work are no longer working. It doesn't really matter which component is doing something wrong, the end result is that the user can't work.If the reason for this is "we opted to go with this new tool" then the cause for the regression is that new tool (even if the technical fault is that some other component doesn't quite comply with the specs, but in a way that never mattered before.This also points out the difference between the official spec of the API and the practical spec (how much of the official spec you really need to implement to make things work (the de-facto spec). As a practical matter, things that don't need to be implemented 'properly' to make things work probably won't be, so if you later change things in such a way that they break if these previously 'optional' things aren't right, you need to think really hard about what value you gain by requiring these things to be right and what fallback options you can provide (either ignoring the broken info or extracting what value you can get from the broken info) rather then breaking completely.there are quite a few people doing infrastructure work for linux that don't pay attention to this sort of thing, and this causes all sorts of problems for users. the case mentioned above where script headers didn't matter before, but break under systemd is a perfect example of this, but the systemd developers are not the only offenders.If you are really starting from scratch, with no installed base (like Android did), then you can just implement the new way of doing things without worrying about backwards compatibility, but if you are writing something that you hope to get added to an existing system (and this includes writing a new version of an existing system, android ICS, Gnome 3, KDE 4, systemd, etc), then you do have to deal with backwards compatibility and the de-facto standard.Yes, thee are times when you can decide to break the de-facto standard (not being willing to do so under any condition leads to a windows-like mess), but you should be very reluctant to do so. Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part XII Posted Jan 27, 2012 17:06 UTC (Fri) by jeremiah (guest, #1221) [Link]
install windows 95 dosbox android download
I actually have the original C&C disks. I've tried to install C&C from them, but disks have become unreadable over the years. So I downloaded it from TPB and installed it just fine in Win7 in compat mode.There's a good story about Windows compatibility - they've actually made a special-purpose memory allocator for Win95 to work around a bug in Sim City.Read it here: - that's how much MS cared about compatibility. That's funny. really... Posted Jan 26, 2012 19:56 UTC (Thu) by HelloWorld (guest, #56129) [Link]
Users _do_ complain about formatting differences and doc format incompatibilities when switching back and forth or dealing with others. But there is nothing _wrong_ with what OO does, its just the network effect of many more office users and (so far as I know) current office still not supporting ODF out of the box.Continuing the general anecdoates of 'normal users' switching to windows. I know two who used to be Ubuntu users but now have Windows laptops. That's mostly because their new machines came with Windows and they didn't have huge incentives to change it. Most of that was that its just easier to be doing the same as the majority (doc formats, general knowledge on how to fix things).I help one get access to a mercurial repo a few days ago and she immediately recognised that this would be _so_ much easier on ubuntu because she could just do apt-get install mercurial; hg clone .On windows it was a faff. She kept saying 'Windows is fine so long as you aren't trying to do anything more that browse and write docs'.So users do understand, and it's not really about proprietary apps. It's largely inertia in terms of what comes with the machines, combined with the networks effects (at least in these cases). Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part XII Posted Jan 23, 2012 14:44 UTC (Mon) by pyellman (guest, #4997) [Link]
My now 14-year old daughter learned to use the Gimp alongside various commercial alternatives (Photoshop, Corel), and, at this point, immediately downloads and install the Gimp on any machines she uses, despite having access to aforementioned commercial alternatives. She is quite competent with all the products mentioned. This was with absolutely no pressure from me, other than introducing her to the Gimp (nearly 6 years ago) and a one-time discussion of its benefits, which include always having access to that software.If you are ever in the Charlottesville, Virginia, area, please stop by and I will introduce you. Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part XII Posted Jan 23, 2012 22:32 UTC (Mon) by cmccabe (guest, #60281) [Link] 2ff7e9595c
Comentarios